Jump to content

Ex vivo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ex vivo brainstem: A. coronal view displaying the anterior portion of the tissue sample; B. sagittal view displaying the left-hand side of the tissue sample[1]

Ex vivo (Latin for 'out of the living') refers to experiments or measurements performed on biological materials—such as tissues, organs, or cells—that have been removed from an organism and maintained under conditions that, to some extent, mimic their natural environment. This approach preserves the functional viability and structural integrity of the extracted materials for a limited time, enabling the study of biological processes in a controlled setting. While certain ex vivo techniques have been employed since the early 20th century, their formalization and refinement as a research methodology accelerated in the mid-20th century. Ex vivo studies are widely applied in medical research, pharmacology, and biotechnology, serving as an intermediate method between in vitro and in vivo studies. They provide a balance between experimental control and physiological relevance, allowing for investigations that may be ethically or technically impractical in living subjects.[2][3][4]

Advantages and limitations

[edit]

Ex vivo, meaning 'out of the living' in Latin, refers to biological studies conducted on tissues, organs, or cells that have been removed from an organism and maintained in a controlled environment outside the body, preserving functional viability and structural integrity of the extracted materials for a limited time. As these materials are subject to degradation over time, the controlled environment typically includes oxygenation, nutrient supply, as well as regulated temperature and humidity—often facilitated through cell culture media or specialized chambers. As an intermediate approach between in vitro studies, which traditionally use isolated cells in artificial conditions,[a] and in vivo studies, which occur within a living organism, ex vivo models offer greater organizational complexity than the former while reducing the variables inherent in the latter.[6][7][8] Ex vivo models retain more of the tissue's natural structure than traditional cell cultures, while allowing for more controlled experiments than those conducted in living organisms.[9] This approach may offer ethical considerations, as ex vivo models can potentially reduce reliance on animal testing for certain types of biological research.[10][11][12]

In dermatological research, human skin organ culture (hSOC)—a technique where excised human skin is maintained in an artificial medium while preserving its natural structure—is used to investigate wound healing, drug penetration, and toxicology, leveraging the preservation of skin architecture, including appendages.[7] These models facilitate the study of conditions unique to human skin, such as keloids, which cannot be accurately replicated in animal models.[13] Skin explants from surgical procedures provide insights into early-stage physiological responses to laser treatments that closely resemble in vivo observations, though processes like re-epithelialization occur more slowly than in living tissue.[14] In intervertebral disc research, ex vivo models that retain vertebral bone allow for testing potential drugs and investigating loading effects on disc degeneration and repair.[15] In biosensing and electroanalytical applications, ex vivo methods offer experimental flexibility unavailable in living systems. While in vivo experiments typically favor smaller electrodes—micro- and nanoelectrodes—to minimize invasiveness, larger electrodes can be used in certain applications. Ex vivo approaches, by contrast, permit custom electrode geometries that interface precisely with biological tissues under controlled conditions, without the same constraints on size and invasiveness. This adaptability enables detailed examination of biological analytes and their physiological roles. Ex vivo electrochemical methods are applied in neuroscience, pharmacology, and biomedical engineering to study neurotransmitter dynamics, metabolic activity, and disease-associated biomarkers.[16]: 161–164 [17]: 3–4 

However, ex vivo models have inherent limitations, including significant changes in biophysical properties of tissues after the organism's death, tissue degradation that increases with time, restricted viability duration, as well as absence of whole-body physiological responses, such as lack of blood circulation and nerve innervation. These constraints prevent the models from replicating long-term or systemic effects.[6][18] The comparison between in vivo and ex vivo models can be complex due to these changes in tissue properties. For instance, studies have found large changes in electric fields between in vivo and ex vivo measurements that increased with postmortem time.[18]

Techniques

[edit]
Demonstration of isolation of choroid from the mouse eye[19]
In situ lung function evaluation, and assessment of total lung capacity (TLC) and basal elastance after performing a recruitment maneuver[20]

Ex vivo research uses specialized techniques to sustain tissues or cells outside their natural environment while preserving their functional integrity. In ex vivo organ perfusion, whole organs—such as the heart or lungs—are maintained in a functional state by circulating solutions that mimic physiological blood flow. This method enables researchers to investigate organ-level responses to drugs, disease states, or environmental changes under controlled conditions. By contrast, organ culture traditionally involves maintaining organ sections or small fragments in static or semi-static conditions without active perfusion.[21][22]

Another widely used technique is organotypic slice cultures, where thin sections of organs are maintained on supportive matrices to preserve their three-dimensional structure and cellular interactions. This method enables the study of localized responses, tissue-specific dynamics, and physiological processes over extended periods.[23][24][25] An example is the use of hippocampal slices in neuroscience research to examine long-term cellular and synaptic activity.[26] In some cases, ex vivo electroporation, in which an electric field is applied to cells to facilitate the uptake of genetic material, is used to introduce DNA into cells within tissue slices, allowing researchers to study gene expression in a controlled environment.[27]: 241 

Cell culture involves isolating individual cells from tissues and growing them in a medium enriched with nutrients and growth factors. While these cultures retain some functional characteristics of their tissue of origin, they often exhibit changes in phenotype and gene expression when removed from their native environment. Primary cell cultures, derived directly from tissues, more closely resemble physiological conditions than immortalized cell lines, making them essential for studying cellular behavior, disease mechanisms, and drug effects.[28][29]

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ However, advanced in vitro models have evolved from simple 2D cultures to more complex 3D systems like organoids and organ-on-a-chip platforms, which aim to better replicate tissue architecture. This progression blurs the line between traditional in vitro and ex vivo models.[5]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Ford, Anastasia A.; Colon-Perez, Luis; Triplett, William T.; Gullett, Joseph M.; Mareci, Thomas H.; Fitzgerald, David B. (2013). "Imaging White Matter in Human Brainstem". Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 7: 400. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00400. PMC 3721683. PMID 23898254.
  2. ^ Makdisi, G; Makdisi, T; Jarmi, T; Caldeira, CC (2017). "Ex vivo lung perfusion review of a revolutionary technology". Annals of Translational Medicine. 5 (17): 343. doi:10.21037/atm.2017.07.17. PMC 5599284. PMID 28936437.
  3. ^ Griffiths, John R. (2022). "Magnetic resonance spectroscopy ex vivo: A short historical review". NMR in Biomedicine. 35 (4): e4740. doi:10.1002/nbm.4740. PMID 35415860.
  4. ^ Maroli, Amith Sadananda; Powers, Robert (2023). "Closing the gap between in vivo and in vitro omics: using QA/QC to strengthen ex vivo NMR metabolomics". NMR in Biomedicine. 36 (4): e4594. doi:10.1002/nbm.4594. PMC 8821733. PMID 34369014.
  5. ^ Nairon, Kylie G.; Skardal, Aleksander (September 2021). "Biofabrication of advanced in vitro and ex vivo cancer models for disease modeling and drug screening". Future Drug Discovery. 3 (3). doi:10.4155/fdd-2020-0034.
  6. ^ a b Piglionico, Sofia Silvia; Pons, Coline; Romieu, Olivier; Cuisinier, Frédéric; Levallois, Bernard; Panayotov, Ivan Vladislavov (2023). "In vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo models for dental pulp regeneration". Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 34 (15): 15. doi:10.1007/s10856-023-06718-2. PMC 10067643. PMID 37004591.
  7. ^ a b Zhou, Lijuan; Zhang, Xianqi; Paus, Ralf; Lu, Zhongfa (2018). "The renaissance of human skin organ culture: A critical reappraisal". Differentiation. 104: 22–35. doi:10.1016/j.diff.2018.10.002. PMID 30391646.
  8. ^ Mohizin, Abdul; Imran, Jakir Hossain; Lee, Kee Sung; Kim, Jung Kyung (February 2023). "Dynamic interaction of injected liquid jet with skin layer interfaces revealed by microsecond imaging of optically cleared ex vivo skin tissue model". Journal of Biological Engineering. 17 (1): 15. doi:10.1186/s13036-023-00335-x. PMC 9969392. PMID 36849998.
  9. ^ Szczesny, Spencer E. (July 2020). "Ex vivo models of musculoskeletal tissues". Connective Tissue Research. 61 (3–4): 245–247. doi:10.1080/03008207.2020.1742418. PMID 32340565.
  10. ^ Ruppelt, Alicia; Pappers, Claire; de Mol, Bas; Spee, Bart; Rasponi, Marco; Stijnen, Marco (June 2022). "P1: Ex Vivo Liver Perfusion for Research Purposes. Can We Use Slaughterhouse Material to Reduce Animal Testing?". ASAIO Journal. 68 (Supplement 2): 91. doi:10.1097/01.mat.0000841220.50962.35.
  11. ^ Macartney, R. A.; Das, A.; Imaniyyah, A. G.; Fricker, A.; Smith, A. M. (February 2025). "In vitro and ex vivo models of the oral mucosa as platforms for the validation of novel drug delivery systems". Journal of Tissue Engineering. 16. doi:10.1177/20417314241313458. PMID 39944725.
  12. ^ Tang, Shirley N.; Bonilla, Andres F.; Chahine, Nadeen O.; Colbath, Aimee C.; Easley, Jeremiah T.; Grad, Sibylle; Haglund, Lisbet; Le Maitre, Christine L.; Leung, Victor; McCoy, Annette M.; Purmessur, Devina; Tang, Simon Y.; Zeiter, Stephan; Smith, Lachlan J. (December 2022). "Controversies in spine research: Organ culture versus in vivo models for studies of the intervertebral disc". JOR Spine. 5 (4): e1235. doi:10.1002/jsp2.1235. PMC 9799089. PMID 36601369.
  13. ^ Sharma, J. R.; Lebeko, M.; Kidzeru, E. B.; Khumalo, N. P.; Bayat, A. (December 2019). "In vitro and ex vivo models for functional testing of therapeutic anti-scarring drug targets in keloids". Advances in Wound Care. 8 (12): 655–670. doi:10.1089/wound.2019.1040. PMC 6904937. PMID 31827980.
  14. ^ Cho, H.; Won, C.H.; Chang, S.E.; Lee, M.W.; Park, G. (2013). "Usefulness and Limitations of Skin Explants to Assess Laser Treatment". Medical Lasers. 2 (2): 58–63. doi:10.25289/ML.2013.2.2.58.
  15. ^ Grant, Michael; Epure, Laura M.; Salem, Omar; AlGarni, Nadim; Ciobanu, Oana; Alaqeel, Maha; Antoniou, John; Mwale, Fackson (July 2016). "Development of a Large Animal Long-Term Intervertebral Disc Organ Culture Model That Includes the Bony Vertebrae for Ex Vivo Studies". Tissue Engineering Part C: Methods. 22 (7): 636–644. doi:10.1089/ten.tec.2016.0049. PMID 27216856.
  16. ^ Patel, Bhavik A. (2021). "8. Measurement from ex vivo tissues". Electrochemistry for Bioanalysis. Elsevier. ISBN 9780128215357 – via Google Books.
  17. ^ Michael, Adrian C.; Borland, Laura M. (2007). "1. An Introduction to Electrochemical Methods in Neuroscience". In Michael, Adrian C.; Borland, Laura M. (eds.). Electrochemical Methods for Neuroscience. CRC Press. ISBN 9781420005868 – via Google Books.
  18. ^ a b Opitz, Alexander; Falchier, Arnaud; Linn, Gary S.; Milham, Michael P.; Schroeder, Charles E. (May 2017). "Limitations of ex vivo measurements for in vivo neuroscience". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 114 (20): 5243–5246. Bibcode:2017PNAS..114.5243O. doi:10.1073/pnas.1617024114. PMC 5441777. PMID 28461475.
  19. ^ Shao, Zhuo; Friedlander, Mollie; Hurst, Christian G.; Cui, Zhenghao; Pei, Dorothy T.; Evans, Lucy P.; Juan, Aimee M.; Tahir, Houda; Duhamel, François; Chen, Jing; Sapieha, Przemyslaw; Chemtob, Sylvain; Joyal, Jean-Sébastien; Smith, Lois E. H. (2013). "Choroid Sprouting Assay: An Ex Vivo Model of Microvascular Angiogenesis". PLOS ONE. 8 (7): e69552. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...869552S. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0069552. PMC 3724908. PMID 23922736. S2CID 466393.
  20. ^ Bassani, Giulia Alessandra; Lonati, Caterina; Brambilla, Daniela; Rapido, Francesca; Valenza, Franco; Gatti, Stefano (2016). "Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in the Rat: Detailed Procedure and Videos". PLOS ONE. 11 (12): e0167898. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1167898B. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167898. PMC 5148015. PMID 27936178.
  21. ^ Menander, M.; Attawar, S.; Mahesh, BN.; Tisekar, O.; Mohandas, A. (2024). "Ex vivo lung perfusion and the Organ Care System: a review". Clinical Transplant Research. 38 (1): 23–36. doi:10.4285/ctr.23.0057. PMC 11075812. PMID 38725180.
  22. ^ Martins, Paulo N.; Del Turco, Serena; Gilbo, Nicholas (2022). "Organ Therapeutics During Ex-Situ Dynamic Preservation: A Look Into the Future". European Journal of Transplantation. 1 (1): 63–78. doi:10.57603/EJT-010.
  23. ^ Peng, Michael; Margetts, Tyler J.; Sugali, Chenna Kesavulu; Rayana, Naga Pradeep; Dai, Jiannong; Sharma, Tasneem P.; Raghunathan, Vijay Krishna; Mao, Weiming (2022). "An ex vivo model of human corneal rim perfusion organ culture". Experimental Eye Research. 214: 108891. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2021.108891. PMC 8792355. PMID 34896309.
  24. ^ Humpel, Christian (2015). "Organotypic brain slice cultures: a review". Neuroscience. 305: 86–98. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.086. PMC 4699268. PMID 26254240.
  25. ^ Siwczak, Fatina; Hiller, Charlotte; Pfannkuche, Helga; Schneider, Marlon R. (2023). "Culture of vibrating microtome tissue slices as a 3D model in biomedical research". Journal of Biological Engineering. 17 (1): 36. doi:10.1186/s13036-023-00357-5. PMC 10233560. PMID 37264444.
  26. ^ Jang, Sooah; Kim, Hyunjeong; Kim, Hye-Jin; Lee, Su Kyoung; Kim, Eun Woo; Namkoong, Kee; Kim, Eosu (2018). "Long-Term Culture of Organotypic Hippocampal Slice from Old 3xTg-AD Mouse: An ex vivo Model of Alzheimer's Disease". Psychiatry Investigation. 15 (2): 205–213. doi:10.30773/pi.2017.04.02. PMC 5900409. PMID 29475217.
  27. ^ Carter, Matt; Shieh, Jennifer C. (2015). "11. Gene Delivery Strategies". Guide to Research Techniques in Neuroscience (2nd ed.). Academic Press. ISBN 9780128005972 – via Google Books.
  28. ^ Pan, Cuiping; Kumar, Chanchal; Bohl, Sebastian; Klingmueller, Ursula; Mann, Matthias (2009). "Comparative proteomic phenotyping of cell lines and primary cells to assess preservation of cell type-specific functions". Molecular & Cellular Proteomics. 8 (3): 443–450. doi:10.1074/mcp.M800258-MCP200. PMC 2649808. PMID 18952599.
  29. ^ Nilsson, Linnéa M.; Castresana-Aguirre, Miguel; Scott, Lena; Brismar, Hjalmar (2020). "RNA-seq reveals altered gene expression levels in proximal tubular cell cultures compared to renal cortex but not during early glucotoxicity". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 108891. Bibcode:2020NatSR..1010390N. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-67361-3. PMC 7316724. PMID 32587318.