Talk:False statement
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
For a May 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/False statement
False Statement
[edit]Hello, I'm the creator of this link. In retrospect, I did notice it to be a bit political, so I changed the example of the US political examples to 2 hypothetical situations. I hope this helps.
A lie and a false statement are not mutually exclusive. A lie is purported to be true, but it's actually a statement that's known to be untrue and used to deceive the second or third party in a coversation.
A false statement is a statement that's untrue, but malicious intent may or may not be the motivation.
"The terrorists win"
[edit]Is there a reason "The terrorists win" redirects to this article? Near as I can tell it would be more appropriate to classify it as a thought-terminating cliche or a logical fallacy of some kind. 199.20.68.40 (talk) 14:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
- I completely agree. If anything, "The Terrorists win" should re-direct to the terrorists have won. Can somebody please fix? GreaseballNYC (talk) 22:00, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
"False or misleading statements" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect False or misleading statements has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 7 § False or misleading statements until a consensus is reached. — Anonymous 03:44, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
- Start-Class law articles
- High-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class logic articles
- Low-importance logic articles
- Logic task force articles
- Start-Class ethics articles
- Low-importance ethics articles
- Ethics task force articles